How Much Does It Cost to Find Podcast Guests?

How much does it cost to find podcast guests?

Nothing, if you will do the work yourself and your feed publishes enough for a guest to find you. A marketplace subscription is the middle route and the only one with a public number on it: MatchMaker.fm is 30 days free with no credit card and 5 free conversation starts, then $15/mo. PodMatch is no free tier. Guest plans are $32/mo standard or $64/mo professional, with a money-back guarantee instead of a trial. A done-for-you booking service is the expensive route, and neither of the two we track will quote you without a call.

Our own answer, stated plainly because we are on the list: Let's Make A Podcast is free account on both sides. No card, and messaging is not behind a paywall.

Now divide. A show filling the median 26 chairs a year is buying 26 bookings; a show recording weekly is buying more than twice that. The same monthly fee is a different product at each of those volumes, which is why a flat recommendation is worthless.

First, the denominator: how many guest chairs do you have to fill?

This is the number no pricing page can give you and the one every price depends on. Here is the distribution across the 279 shows that were still publishing when we read their feeds, measured from the guest episodes those feeds publish over a median window of 28 days and annualised.

Two things fall out of that table and both change what you should spend. The first is concentration: the busiest 28 shows account for 78% of every chair we can see. Guest booking is not evenly distributed work. A small number of shows are running something close to a production line, and everyone else is filling a handful of seats a year.

The second is that 215 of the 279 live shows publish no visible guest episode at all. If that is you, the honest first question is not which service to pay, it is whether the format is really a guest format yet. A subscription bought to fill chairs you are not recording is a subscription paying for nothing.

Find your own number before you read another price. Count the guest episodes you published in the last three months and multiply by four. If the answer is in single digits, the free route below is almost certainly the whole answer. If you are in the "52 or more a year" band, a subscription that saves you an hour a week has already paid for itself and the argument moves on to which one.

The free route, and the work it actually costs

Free does not mean effortless. It means the cost is paid in your own time and in what your feed publishes, and it splits into two halves that behave completely differently: being findable, and going out and asking.

The findable half is close to free and most shows leave it undone. Of the 362 feeds we could read, 69% publish nothing a stranger can check about whether they book guests at all, and 15% publish no contact route a stranger could use. That is not a marketing problem, it is a legibility problem: a guest researching shows in your topic cannot tell that you take guests, so you are off the list before anybody has judged you.

• Put the guest's name in the episode title, not only in the notes. 15% of feeds do this, and it is what every research tool reads.
• Say the word "guests" or "interviews" in the show description. Only 19% do.
• Publish an address a stranger can use. 53 of the 362 feeds we read publish none, and it is the cheapest gap on this list to close.

The asking half is where the free route gets expensive, and it is expensive in hours rather than dollars. A free search tool will hand you names: Listen Notes is free podcast and episode search on the site. The Listen API has a free tier and paid plans. What it will not do is tell you which of those people will say yes, or write to them for you. Budget the research and the follow-up honestly. At the median 26 chairs a year, that is a recurring piece of work roughly every fortnight, forever.

The reason the findable half comes first is leverage. Work you do on your own feed keeps paying after you stop doing it; every hour of outreach buys exactly one conversation. Most shows should exhaust the first before spending a cent on the second.

What the paid routes charge, and what you cannot find out

There are two paid shapes and they are priced on opposite principles. A marketplace sells you access to a pool and leaves the choosing to you. A booking service sells you the choosing, the pitching and the scheduling, and prices it like an agency retainer.

The marketplaces publish numbers. The booking services do not: Interview Valet is no published pricing. The way in is a free consultation call. Kitcaster is no pricing page. You apply first, then talk to them. That is a checkable fact about their own pages on 4 August 2026, and it is worth stating plainly rather than filling with an invented range, because every "agencies charge this much" figure in this space is a blog quoting a blog.

Across the 8 named products we track, 5 give you some way in without paying first, whether a free tier, a trial or a free account, and 2 will only discuss numbers on a call. So most of this market can be sampled before it is bought, which is the best piece of news on this page: you can test whether your subject is represented before you subscribe, and a pool with nobody from your subject in it is the failure mode a monthly fee cannot fix.

Three questions worth asking before any subscription, in the order that saves the most money:

• Search your own topic inside the free tier or trial before you pay. A pool of a hundred thousand people is irrelevant if eleven of them work in your subject.
• Divide the annual fee by the chairs you actually fill. At a handful of guest episodes a year almost any subscription is expensive per booking; in the "52 or more a year" band, almost none of them are.
• Ask what happens to an introduction after it is made. Scheduling, reminders and the follow-up are where most of the hours go, and services differ enormously in whether they carry any of it.

What this measurement cannot tell you

Three limits, and they bound every figure above rather than decorating it. First, chairs are counted from what a feed publishes: 23% of live shows show us a guest episode and the rest may still book guests invisibly, so 2357 is a floor on the market's real volume, not an estimate of it.

Second, 13 shows publish faster than our read window could bound, so their annualised figure is held at a ceiling rather than extrapolated. That pushes the concentration figure down slightly, never up.

Third, prices move. Every price on this page was read from the vendor's own page on 4 August 2026 and is quoted rather than summarised, so you can check any of them in a minute. Nothing here is a negotiated rate or an average of what people say they paid.

What none of it can tell you is whether a given service will fill your specific chairs, because that depends on whether the people you want are on it. A free trial answers that in ten minutes and a comparison page cannot answer it at all.

The order to spend in

If you do these in order, most shows stop before they reach step four:

• Count your chairs. Guest episodes in the last quarter, times four. Everything below is priced against this number.
• Fix the free half of findability: guest names in titles, the word "guests" in the description, an address a stranger can use.
• List the show wherever guests already look, on the free tiers, and see what arrives before you pay for anything.
• If you are still short of guests after a month of that, trial one marketplace and search your own topic inside it before subscribing.
• Only consider a done-for-you service when the bottleneck is your hours rather than your pipeline, and you can name what a booked interview is worth to you.

The order matters more than the products. The first two steps cost nothing and are undone on most of the feeds we read, and the last one is priced by conversation. Spending in the other direction is how a show ends up paying a monthly fee to be introduced to people who could not have found it anyway.

Sources and benchmark date

The chair counts are derived at build time from our own read of 362 public podcast feeds between July 16, 2026 to August 26, 2026; the prices are quoted from each vendor's own page as read on 4 August 2026. Method, limitations and the raw data are public:

• Which Podcasts Actually Book Guests? (our study)

  Original analysis of 362 public podcast RSS feeds from a 384-show directory. Source for the guest-chair counts, the concentration figures, the contact-route rate and the guest-evidence rates on this page. Method, limitations and the full dataset are published with it under CC BY 4.0.

• Podcast guest booking platforms, compared

  The full side by side of the 8 named products, including what each one does rather than only what it charges. Every access fact on both pages comes from the same dated source, so the two cannot disagree.

Frequently asked questions